Concerns over bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong intensify as authorities face cultural, safety, and political pressures.
 |
| Remaining bamboo scaffolding is seen at one of the towers after a fire at the Wang Fuk Court residential estate in the Tai Po district of Hong Kong, China, on November 27, 2025. Photo by Lam Yik/Bloomberg/Getty Images |
The debate over bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has intensified following a devastating fire that left at least 146 people dead, prompting questions about whether the traditional construction method played a role in the rapidly spreading blaze. As authorities investigate the cause and residents struggle with the shock of the disaster, the future of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has become a central issue in both safety discussions and cultural conversations.
In the days since the fire engulfed the Wang Fuk Court residential towers, early speculation from local media focused on whether the bamboo poles surrounding the building may have accelerated the flames or created obstacles for firefighters. Although the use of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has long been considered both efficient and cost-effective, some residents wondered whether the practice still belongs in a densely populated modern city facing increasingly complex construction and maintenance challenges.
Officials later emphasized that the speed of the fire may have been more closely linked to the use of styrofoam window coverings, which are still being examined as a potential contributor. Even so, the spotlight on bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has grown sharper, especially as the government signals a shift away from the material.
Chief Executive John Lee was quick to announce that the administration would accelerate plans to restrict and eventually phase out bamboo scaffolding, citing public demand for stronger safety standards after the tragedy. His remarks marked a significant turning point for an industry that relies on generations of skilled workers trained in traditional tying techniques. For many residents, the sudden push to eliminate bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong represents more than just a policy shift; it touches on deeper questions about identity, memory, and the city’s character.
While mainland China has largely transitioned to metal scaffolding for most construction projects, Hong Kong has maintained its reliance on bamboo for decades. Workers trained in building the intricate frameworks have formed a distinct professional community, valued for their precision and adaptability. The sight of bamboo-wrapped skyscrapers has long been one of Hong Kong’s defining visual elements, prominently displayed alongside double-decker trams, harbor ferries, and neon signage as markers of local culture.
Architecture scholar Kristof Crolla, who has incorporated bamboo into his own design work, stressed that the material should not be villainized without evidence. Speaking about the controversy, he noted that bamboo is a natural material that ignites but does not easily sustain flames. Crolla said that the styrofoam panels and protective netting around the building appeared more likely to have accelerated the fire, and he urged the public to consider the disaster in a broader context rather than attributing blame solely to bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong.
Another layer of complexity comes from the lingering political and cultural tensions in the city. For residents who lived through the sweeping street protests six years ago, bamboo scaffolding holds emotional significance that goes beyond its practical function. Some see it as part of the intangible cultural heritage that differentiates Hong Kong from other Chinese cities. Others view the sudden move to eliminate bamboo as part of a broader trend in which traditional practices, symbols, and public expressions are being reshaped or restricted.
Historically, bamboo scaffolding has been deeply rooted in the region. The practice originates from mainland China but became particularly prominent in Hong Kong during the early 20th century. According to heritage experts, bamboo scaffolders even established a formal union as early as 1911, suggesting a long-standing professional culture tied to construction work in the territory. Terry Yip, a cultural heritage specialist, explained that the ubiquity of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has created a sense of ownership among locals, who see it as both an everyday sight and an expression of the city’s craftsmanship.
Beyond culture, the preference for bamboo also stems from practical considerations. Bamboo is lightweight, flexible, and easy to cut, making it ideal for navigating Hong Kong’s crowded and irregular urban landscape. Buildings are frequently situated only inches apart, creating gaps that metal scaffolding sometimes cannot accommodate. The adaptability of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has therefore made it indispensable for many contractors, especially those working in older neighborhoods where the geometry of structures varies greatly.
Economically, a shift toward metal scaffolding could displace many local workers who specialize in bamboo construction. Some industry representatives warn that the transition could strengthen the market position of mainland-based firms, whose laborers predominantly handle metal scaffolding. For Hong Kong’s scaffolders, who often come from multigenerational families within the trade, this raises concerns about the loss of livelihoods along with the erosion of a traditional craft.
On the mainland, reactions to the controversy have varied widely. Several social media users expressed skepticism toward the public defense of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong, accusing residents of clinging to outdated identities or resisting modern construction standards. Others criticized the Hong Kong construction sector for protecting its own economic interests. These responses have deepened the debate, fueling discussions over how much of the city’s cultural distinctiveness should influence policymaking in the wake of a major disaster.
Meanwhile, the government has taken steps to manage public anger over the tragedy. Authorities recently arrested an individual who launched a petition calling for more transparency and stronger follow-up action from officials. Critics say the move is an attempt to control the narrative around the disaster, while the administration argues that misinformation and unverified claims risk undermining public confidence at a sensitive time.
Despite growing pressure, the future of bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong remains uncertain. Some policymakers advocate for a gradual transition to metal alternatives that would allow scaffolders time to adjust and retrain. Others insist on an immediate ban to reassure the public and prevent similar tragedies. Industry groups have proposed a compromise that would apply stricter safety standards to bamboo scaffolding rather than outlawing it, arguing that improved oversight and better material regulations could reduce risks while preserving heritage.
As investigations continue, the immediate focus remains on supporting affected families and determining the precise causes of the fire. Yet the broader conversation sparked by the tragedy is unlikely to fade soon. The debate over bamboo scaffolding in Hong Kong has become entwined with broader concerns about safety, cultural preservation, and the city’s evolving identity. Whatever decisions emerge from policymakers, the outcome will shape not only the future of construction practices but also the symbolic landscape of a city grappling with rapid change.
